Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Why My Facebook Movie Sucked
I avoided Facebook for a few years when it first became a craze. Frankly, there are people who I didn't want to connect with, and I certainly didn't care to tell the world What Was On My Mind because I was not in a good place.
Like most people, my relationship is love/hate. I love the way I can interact with distant cousins and internet friends who I would have otherwise lost track of because, let's face it, I'm not big on phone calls and its nice to be able to drop them a PM occasionally without having a two hour conversation. That may sound like a hollow relationship but it's better than no relationship at all and it often does lead to two hour phone conversations or longer emails.
I began to hate the way Facebook prompted me to share my every thought and life event with all those people. I'm increasingly uncomfortable sharing my life one out of context picture at a time to be seen by whoever wanders on for a moment that day, only to have it buried under commentary about Obama or Justin Bieber the next. Maybe it's my growing health problem, but I've come to value some of these candid moments in a way that makes me want to hoard them for myself.
Which leaves me without much to say on FB unless I engage in political and religious debate, and that is a temptation I am seldom able to resist. My views on those topics have come after many long and difficult years of testing them out, revising them, and even suffering for them. So I feel strongly. Conversely I am given to snarkiness and satire, which makes my posts about these topics seem flippant and reactionary when I intend them to be anything but. Since most FB readers have a short attention span, I'm forced to cram what should be a 30 minute discussion with context into a two sentence comment. It's a bad combination which has painted me as a grumpy, loud mouthed jerk who speaks before he thinks. If you know me in real life, I only tend toward that occasionally (I hope). I think about things deeply but am inclined to do so out loud when I haven't quite got it figured out. This is a formula for hurt feelings and arguments on Facebook.
So in trying to avoid all of the above I'm left with commenting on geek culture and short updates about my health. Boring.
So my Facebook Movie was put together last week, I presume, by the good folks who run the site. But when I watched it, it didn't look like a movie of my life at all. There were none of the heart wrenching failures and losses, none of the elated victories and sense of accomplishment that has characterized the last four years of my life. No mention of finishing The Phantom Tollbooth with two delighted boys. No coming to an understanding with a new dog that I struggled to accept because our previous dog left an aching hole in our lives that will never be filled. No memories of my boys tousled hair when they slept in too late, their joys and sorrows. No coming to terms with my anger about old grievances and finding peace. Nothing about the ongoing kindness of strangers in our lives. No victory lap for my wife and I as we conquered obstacles that would have landed most couples in divorce court. None of that was there. And that has been my life over four years.
Facebook got it wrong because I refused to share myself with it on any meaningful level. I wonder how true that is for my friends and family who are often put off by my FB comments that come from years of examination of what I believe to be true and real in this life, and far more experience than any 43 year old should rightfully have. There is no way to convey all of that in three sentences and a picture and is therefore easy to dismiss as ranting or emotion. Either way, that stuff isn't my life. It may define me to a point, but my life is so much more than anything I can fit on FB and more than I can express in the time most people give a typical FB post. It is more than a funny meme or a passing quiz to find out which Star Wars character I am (Anakin).
I guess that's why I have a blog. Maybe I should start using it more instead of trying to make empty points that don't come off as I intend in the first place. That's not a resolution but a realization that Facebook is what it is. And for all its immediacy and cleverness it still doesn't know me, and it's impossible for anyone else to know me through it. That job is still mine and I have to do better than memes and cheap shot political commentary. I promise I'll try.
P.S. Also that's not the music of my life's movie. How about In My Life by The Beatles or Right Now by Van Halen? Or even Live Forever by Queen, or Die With Your Boots On by Maiden? Wrong, wrong, wrong.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Since most FB readers have a short attention span, I'm forced to cram what should be a 30 minute discussion with context into a two sentence comment."
ReplyDeleteYES! This is exactly why blogging is so much better than Facebook. Not to mention, when you want to look up a really good, older discussion you've had, it's archived and easily accessible. Not so with Facebook. My cousin-in-law has summed up FB the best way I've heard:
"Facebook is like high school. Everyone is talking, but no one is listening." So true. People only see what's up during those few minutes they pop in. They miss everything before and after (which often leads to a lot of stupid questions days later - "Wait, what? You're sick? What happened?").
That beautiful paragraph you just shared about your boys, your dog, your books, your wife, your friends? THAT is what it's about. I'd much rather read what you've got here than some quick line on Facebook that is mixed in with 78 other quick lines and then buried way down deep on a news feed.
Plus? Your boys and everyone else who loves you can read, search, and learn SO much more about you - and about what really matters - here than on FB. Blogging for the win!
And see? On Facebook, people click a banal "thumbs up" picture to "like" something - what the hell does that even mean?!? Those who care will take the time to read, communicate, and have discourse with you. I think you'll have dialogue with far fewer people, but I bet it will be more meaningful.
ReplyDeletePlus, this is now the third time I've had to prove I'm not a robot by entering a series of numbers in order to talk with you on here. THAT is love and dedication.
ReplyDelete"I like this."
And we didn't have to "friend" each other. We ARE friends, so we can talk to each other, listen to each other, and care about each other without having to add each other to a list of, well, everyone. I know what kind of friend I'd rather have.
ReplyDelete(Hint: the one who takes the time to read long blog posts and comment about them).
And the one who has now entered numbers 4 different times to prove she's not a robot . . .
THAT'S friendship.
ReplyDelete(5 times).
Wasn't sure how you felt about FB, Stacy. Thanks for sharing. :)
ReplyDeleteBut you have to consider this as well: Some people (including myself) are forced - in a sense - to communicate with friends and family through Facebook. I don't think there's a Blogger vs. FB war going on. I DO think FB has devastated discussion forums. I have a strong connection to an online community that has largely abandoned its forums in favor of FB. We reached a point where FB made more sense because after ten years, we weren't discussing games so much anymore as we were discussing our lives. That became really awkward in a forum that welcomes new members. FB has been a good change for us because it allows us to take those relationships further without having to deal with people we don't really know that well. That said, to disconnect from FB would be to cut some 30+ people whom I value deeply out of my life completely and I'm not willing to do that.
ReplyDeleteConsider also that while you and I love to write and it comes naturally to us, that is not the case for many people. For them, the thought of updating a blog to share their life would be horrifying. FB works for these people, and again, I'm not willing to ditch them just because they aren't drawn to the blogosphere like others. Clearly blogging is the better way to go, but it's not an either/or for everyone. For some (like me) it's both, and for some, blogs aren't even on their radar. Rather than try to force them into my preferred means of communication, I meet them halfway because they're worth it to me.
I think everyone's experience is different. I have a very selective friends list. I'd say 90% of them are either people I know in real life from whom I'm physically separated by distance, or people with whom I have a long online relationship. In both cases, I'd say FB has enhanced rather than detracted from those relationships. I've had more phone conversations with my cousins in recent years due to FB than I've ever had in my life previously. I've re-connected with friends I feared gone forever and have re-established and continued meaningful relationships with them because of FB.
I also tend to approach reading FB a little differently. I scan the main feed if I have time, but I typically spend a few moments a week looking through several of my friends specific pages and I can get a pretty good idea of what's going on in their life (unless they're like me and never post anything substantial). That often prompts a phone call or e-mail. I wish everyone used it this way.
So yeah, love/hate. I don't feel trapped by it, but I also see the benefit if I use it for my own purposes and don't become a mindless zombie, blindly "friending" people and "liking" things. I do that consciously so that it actually enriches me rather than sucking my time and mental energies. It's also a great way to attract blog traffic and keep up with music releases, tour schedules, and interviews with artists and writers. So there's that.
Facebook certainly has a purpose for a lot of people, and you're probably right that there are TONS of people that don't have the interest in nor talent for writing, so blogging is a bit more intimidating. And while I do see some people connecting in meaningful ways, the vast majority of what I see on FB is a series of mindless shares and likes. I can't even begin to imagine how much time has been wasted creating photo memes, putting cutesy quotes on e-cards, sharing photos of things no one really cares about, etc., etc., etc. Also, I think a lot of users feel emboldened and able to spew vitriol and ignorance without any real consequences. They collect a series of "likes" and feel vindicated. As Stacy pointed out to me recently, no one Snopes checks anything on FB. "Hey, check out this statistic I found pasted on top of an emotionally charged photo with commentary from some talking head verified by absolutely no one with any intelligence or authority."
ReplyDeleteLike
Like
Like
My biggest issue with FB (as Stacy pointed out earlier) is the inherent impermanence of it all. It promotes and perpetuates superficiality by its very nature. There's a place for that, I suppose, but given the finite nature of time itself, spending too much time on there seems like a risky proposition.
By the way, I "like" this post. And, I am not a robot.
I get that it's different things for different people. I really enjoyed my couple of months on there reconnecting with old friends. When I deactivated my account, it was only supposed to be for a month, but in that month, I realized that I didn't miss it, so I haven't turned it back on (and that was almost 5 years ago). Also, those I really care to be in touch with regularly, I already am.
ReplyDeletePart of it is me, too. When I'm on there, I feel the need to read everything everyone posts (I don't want to be one of those clueless people or someone who only talks about myself without bothering to see what my friends are up to - that would be hypocritical; plus, isn't the point to be connected and know what's going on with one another?). I mean, if the point is to stay connected, then I should, you know, read what people are saying. Thing is, I find most of the things they're posting -- friends and family included -- are rather banal and stupid. If people ONLY posted pictures and big events and maybe one thing every few days (kind of like most people do in blogging), I'd LOVE it. But most of it is stupid (and funny) memes, inspirational quotes, pictures of bookshelves, random thoughts or food cravings, and bathroom habits that they want to share, etc. I feel like I spend a LOT of time combing through that stuff to find the occasional engagement announcement, travel pictures, sweet story about their kids, etc.
I'm also way too ADD *and* OCD to handle it. The ADD makes me easily distracted - too much to take in, and the OCD makes me want to try to take it all in. Overstimulation.
So yeah, it's not for everyone (like me), but I get that some people like it. I don't begrudge them that, but I personally don't enjoy it and it can be a big time-suck for me (I prefer to read a blog post when I can rather than comb through a dynamic, ever-filling newsfeed). And while it may not be a competition thing, I know many people who have given up blogging, because FB is just "easier" and "quicker." And whereas I used to know so much more about what's going on with them and their families, now I know what George Takei joke they like or what kind of donut they had for breakfast. So, I end up feeling LESS connected, and then I wonder what the point is.
Yes. What Stacy said, which is partly what I was writing at the same time, but mostly it's better than what I said. Hit "like" if you agree. Then post this to your wall and see how many friends you really have. ;)
ReplyDeleteAnd then post a comment underneath using only one word to tell me how we met (because apparently I don't already know that).
ReplyDeleteYe gods, those types of things drive me insane. I often find myself hiding people's feeds if it's too much of that.
ReplyDeleteJust for kicks, I looked at Mark's FB page just now. I learned that my good friend Jenn just collected a bluebell on Here Be Monsters, someone else achieved a new level on Candy Crush Saga (saga? Really?), and someone else grew a carrot or milked a cow on Farmville. And that's just from the ticker on the side! RIVETING.
DeleteFYI. It's a cake for dinner kind of night.
DeleteROTFL!
DeleteSo, one of my friends on FB asked how to unfriend someone. What ensued was a bunch of people panicking about being unfriended. Then one person said this:
ReplyDeleteNow you have us all nervous You can also "hide" their posts from your newsfeed. Find one of their posts on your newsfeed, click on the upside down ^ to the right if their name. Choose the "unfollow" option.
What brand of insecurity must a person have to want to be hidden, to have everything you share be essentially trashed without being viewed, rather than be removed from a friend list? So. Totally. Asinine.
I just want to say I was beyond happy to see you pop up on Facebook. Missing you and Christie is something I like to do a lot.
ReplyDeleteAlso, thumbs up on the discussion about the asinine nature of FB. I think I accidentally came out on FB as a tree-hugging, gun-hating, equality-loving, religiously ambivalent recycler to my conservative family.
o. the. horror.
You guys have really banal friends and everyone sucks but us.
ReplyDeleteWhat I learned today on FB:
My friend Kelly passed her one year heart transplant testing and is going home (followed up by news that her daughter Bridget is getting a work up to try to control her a-fib)
Followed a link to a debate between Ken Ham and Bill Nye on Creationism vs. Evolution
(followed by Pat Roberston asking Ken Ham to shut up, which was most entertaining of all)
Winger starts touring tomorrow and will be coming to New Jersey in May (and listened to their new single - embedded, without having to go to YouTube)
My friend Seth in OK is selling his house
New pictures of my friend Joanna's kids
Ronald Ratcliffe was in NYC today
One of my best online friends, Alex, is unplugging from FB, which means the frequency of our phone calls will increase.
Read the first chapter of a friend's novel
Followed a link to the new Dream Theater video
Read an article about a pill that may cure HCM
Read a counter-post about the same, cautioning patience
King's X starts touring in May and is coming to Sellersville, PA
My friend Robin just finished the final draft of the next novel in her Mercy Grave series
Watched a clip of Jon Stewart taking Nancy Pelosi to task
Watched (with the kids) a mini-documentary about the "Natural" label on food products
Posted a link to this blog post and got serious traffic for the first time in months
Could I have found all of this stuff elsewhere? About 50% of it. But not collected in one place. You guys might seriously need to cull your friends list to people who aren't boring (that would be everyone but us, ahem), and subscribe to things you like. I definitely had to wade through a bunch of memes, recipes, and pet pictures to see that stuff but I would say the substantive outweighs the banal on most days. Point is, that is all valuable information to me and it's worth slogging through some of the dumb stuff to get to it (kind of like TV or a magazine). I'm getting out of it what I tell it to give me, for the most part. The rest, I end up hiding, unsubscribing from, or unfriending. When taylored like that, it's not quite as annoying.
Um, we're totally riffing and joking around. Exaggerating for effect. Didn't mean to hit a nerve. As you were . . .
ReplyDeleteAlso, if I were on Facebook, I think I would want to be friends with Robin. She sounds cool.
Dude, someone is getting defensive without being attacked. ;) We were just messing around with you, having some fun. Go on with your bad self. Are you going to hide me now? :)
ReplyDeleteOh, you didn't! Just thought it might be valuable to the discussion to give example of the good stuff. Do you guys seriously not get good stuff on your feed? It's honestly the best way to keep up with artists you like these days.
ReplyDeleteAnd Robin IS cool. And creative. And has great taste in music. You'd like her.
The stuff you mentioned is real though, and REALLY annoying. Game invites are the worst.
ReplyDelete"Facebook got it wrong because I refused to share myself with it on any meaningful level."
ReplyDeleteYour poor friends, sharing with you when you don't share with them.
Again. JOKE. Kidding. Unclench. Go rant about Rush Limbaugh. Or make a FB movie. Or whatever.
Mark, I can't see you anymore or anything you post. There's no hide feature on blogger but I'm holding my finger over your post. TAKE THAT.
ReplyDeleteRIGHT? I don't know why anyone keeps me on as a friend. My etiquette is horrible and I really do nothing but repost funny memes. You should have seen the movie in question. It actually pulled up a picture of the Swedish Chef at one point. Out of desperation, I guess.
ReplyDeletePoke.
ReplyDeleteDON'T TOUCH ME THERE.
ReplyDeleteOh, sure there's good stuff. That's why we said we were kidding. I actually hide people now and then to avoid all the wasted time. I've just noticed that a lot of very interesting or personal conversations can get buried very quickly so it seems like people are taking the fire hose approach to sharing. Say everything and anything that comes to mind and see what comes of it. It all feels very "look at me (but I'm not looking at you)."
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm taking the FB approach to this comment thread: I'm going to keep talking and ignore you. You can hide me but my words live on.
If you can find them. Hint: they're right above the recycled ash tray art and right below the picture of the Dos equis guy.
Okay. I was thinking, "no wonder they don't like FB."
ReplyDeleteWould you like to buy me a cow in Candyville?
If you send me Candyville garbage, I'll keep bugging you about marketing the books! All I want is the weird and twisted views of life on the edge that I have come to expect from the brain you keep in your hip pocket, unless you're wearing sweats.
ReplyDelete